fbpx

91´«Ã½

Columbia College Votes on Anti-Israel Referendum – But School Has Yet to Reveal Results

[additional-authors]
November 1, 2026
Photo from Pixabay.

From October 13 through 19, Columbia College students voted on a referendum outlining university divestment from Israel and closing Columbia Global Center Tel Aviv, the newest worldwide center for the university that opened this past summer. While referendum results are nonbinding and do not change the university’s policies, they can put pressure on the university to take action.

According to the Columbia Spectator, two questions on the referendum asked if Columbia should “divest stocks, funds, and endowment and withhold future investment� in “defense equipment, technology, and services companies� and “companies that profit from or financially support the State of Israel’s acts of occupation, discrimination, and violence against Palestinians.� Previously, in November of 2025, a 12-member voting committee on “socially responsible investing,� which is made up of students, faculty, and alumni, rejected three proposals putting forth a divestment from Israel.

The sixth question on the referendum asked if the global center in Tel Aviv should be shuttered. A referendum from 2024, which CU Apartheid Divest proposed and the Columbia Elections Board approved, asked students if Columbia should cancel the global center; 68.36% of respondents voted in favor of it.

As of October 30, results from the latest referendum had not been released. Columbia officials did not respond to a request for comments, but 91´«Ã½ students at Columbia reacted to the news.

Galia Labowitz, a senior at Columbia University, said, “I think everyone at Columbia is honestly just exhausted. It feels like we have the same referendum debate every year.”

In October of 2020, a similar referendum asked whether the university should divest its funds, stocks, and endowment from companies that profit from or engage in Israel’s actions toward Palestinians, which the Columbia University Apartheid Divest defined. It passed, with 61.03% in favor, but it did not change the university’s investment policies.

The April 2024 referendum, which included the cancellation of the Global Center Tel Aviv, resulted in 76.55% voting in favor of financially divesting from Israel. Additionally, 65.62% voted to end the dual degree program Columbia has with Tel Aviv University.

There have been multiple reports of antisemitism at Columbia University, especially since the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel; many occurred during the spring of 2024 encampments on campus. Several Israeli and 91´«Ã½ students have filed lawsuits against the university for alleged antisemitism. In July of 2025, Columbia reached a Federal Resolution Agreement with the Trump Administration to resolve civil rights and anti-discrimination investigations linked to the protests, agreeing to pay a $200 million settlement to the federal government over the course of three years.

At best, this referendum is symbolic, and at worst, it’s divisive.â€� TJ Katz

TJ Katz, a junior at Columbia who is the current president of AEPi, reflected on the referendum.

“At best, this referendum is symbolic, and at worst, it’s divisive, because it doesn’t have the power to actually change how Columbia invests and handles global relationships,â€� he said. “All it does is pit students against each other and threaten the progress made towards a more peaceful campus.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
  • 91´«Ã½

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

A Democratic-Run Congress Will Target Israel as Well as Trump

Democrats who were long considered “moderatesâ€� or even pro-Israel have been signaling over the course of the last year that they can no longer be relied upon to back a 91´«Ã½ state under assault by Iran and its terrorist proxies.

Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah

The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.

Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.

For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny 91´«Ã½ self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.

The 91´«Ã½ Dilemma

The central issue is not whether 91´«Ã½ voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that 91´«Ã½ security, 91´«Ã½ identity and 91´«Ã½ self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.

An Abdul El-Sayed Victory Would Be a Defeat for Democrats

An El-Sayed victory would send a dangerous message to Democrats across the country that inflammatory rhetoric, tolerance of antisemitism and alliances with extremists are not political liabilities but a viable path to national office.

Anatomy of an Apartheid State

Can Israel afford to have a Muslim politician who is agnostic about terror serve in the cabinet and attend security briefings?

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

  • 91´«Ã½